ezekielrage_99
Aug 2, 07:33 PM
I hope we see iPod updates but I doubt it.....
I want my new iPod :D
I want my new iPod :D
(marc)
Apr 28, 11:57 AM
I wonder who voted this story "Positive"...
reflex
Nov 14, 05:05 AM
I think we most likely held it down too long.
No, I got it too and I stopped holding the button as soon as the light started pulsating. I think it's normal.
No, I got it too and I stopped holding the button as soon as the light started pulsating. I think it's normal.
entatlrg
Apr 27, 08:51 PM
Yes, the 11" is definitely an awesome notebook.
I'm looking for a 'main machine'.
For the long hours I'm on a computer and the type of work I do the 13" is the sensible choice, you get a noticeable amount of added screen real estate which I appreciate.
I'm looking for a 'main machine'.
For the long hours I'm on a computer and the type of work I do the 13" is the sensible choice, you get a noticeable amount of added screen real estate which I appreciate.
Queso
Aug 3, 04:02 AM
They're not my favourite by a long way. Grolsch seems to be my current lager of choice, although I'd rather an ale or bitter TBH.
BornToMac
Jan 10, 01:20 PM
Beaker... (link (http://wallbase.net/wallpaper/652370))
Beaker always puts a smile on my face...!
Beaker always puts a smile on my face...!
nickXedge
Jun 9, 12:01 PM
+1 Hahaha. God I Hope Im eligible for an upgrade on one of my lines (My personal line isn't because i got the 3GS on the day it came out) Might have to steal an upgrade from another family member. : P
You may be eligible for the new iPhone. My brother got the 3GS almost 2 weeks after the launch and he is eligible to upgrade. And if you got the 3GS on launch day, you should obviously be eligible as well.
You may be eligible for the new iPhone. My brother got the 3GS almost 2 weeks after the launch and he is eligible to upgrade. And if you got the 3GS on launch day, you should obviously be eligible as well.
ssteve
Dec 7, 12:49 PM
Yeah, why dont you download it, then say negative things.
You can choose where the occurence happened, no matter where you are. So if at home you have crappy quality, you can later submit the report from somewhere else using the map.
I do not have an iPhone yet. I choose to have consistent service everywhere. If iPhone was on Verizon, then people could just send the report where and when the occurance happened instead of waiting for service else where.
This application must be a response to recent Verizon advertising.
You can choose where the occurence happened, no matter where you are. So if at home you have crappy quality, you can later submit the report from somewhere else using the map.
I do not have an iPhone yet. I choose to have consistent service everywhere. If iPhone was on Verizon, then people could just send the report where and when the occurance happened instead of waiting for service else where.
This application must be a response to recent Verizon advertising.
Anonymous Freak
Jan 17, 08:28 PM
I'm hoping that the special event will announce iLife and iWork '07, plus Leopard. It might be just an announcement, with the actual shipping date sometime mid-February, but it would help steal the thunder from Vista.
trainguy77
Jan 31, 06:09 PM
I thought the human eye couldn't detect anything over 30 fps? :confused:
Then why would CRTs run at anything from 60hertz to 85 ? ;)
Then why would CRTs run at anything from 60hertz to 85 ? ;)
koruki
Apr 17, 04:14 PM
OMG the telephone is white! OK, can MACrumors focus on macs now and leave iOS devices for a while??
Alright sure, oh nothing to say today about Macs so lets just post nothing. Way to keep the site active :rolleyes:
Alright sure, oh nothing to say today about Macs so lets just post nothing. Way to keep the site active :rolleyes:
LagunaSol
May 2, 12:19 PM
Mac Sheeple drive me nuts!
Google Sheeple drive me nuts. We're even.
Google Sheeple drive me nuts. We're even.
osofast240sx
Apr 11, 08:53 AM
so glad none of u guys work for Apple. No Vision:mad:
lt="nokia x6 blue colour. Blue Silver Nokia X6" title="Blue Silver Nokia X6" width="350" />Thunderhawks
Apr 5, 07:50 AM
In other words: "Maybe." :rolleyes:
Maybe it will be released at the end of June.
That's a DEFINITE Maybe !
More importantly will it come in white (wah) and
how long will it take for Android to copy it?
I hear it has triple Retina, with multiple message bounce back.
Dual ply throttlers for Wifi Boosting and Thunderbolt Flash marking!
Now top that Android!
Maybe it will be released at the end of June.
That's a DEFINITE Maybe !
More importantly will it come in white (wah) and
how long will it take for Android to copy it?
I hear it has triple Retina, with multiple message bounce back.
Dual ply throttlers for Wifi Boosting and Thunderbolt Flash marking!
Now top that Android!
Arkanok
Apr 19, 07:35 AM
Anyone know if it'll run well enough to play on a 2007 MBP with 128 nVidia 8600m, c2d, 4gb ram?
I desperately want to buy this game but I'm very hesitant because I don't know if it'll run well enough on my system.
I desperately want to buy this game but I'm very hesitant because I don't know if it'll run well enough on my system.
The.316
Mar 6, 01:48 PM
Mine :D
wpotere
Apr 15, 09:13 AM
I think that most of the time if you have something that isn't allowed then you have the chance of getting suspended anyway. I think the original poster got lucky and I say I was just lucky and the school was just tired of talking to me so they let you me go. However arguing usually does make it worse and in my situation there was things on my iPhone that the school absolutely didn't need to see and I didn't see how I had to give it up.
Why take that attitude? Sometimes it is nothing more than a simple mistake. However, if you automatically start to throw defenses up, you will make people think that you have something to hide. I would simply lock the device and hand it over then retrieve it on the way home. No biggie.
Why take that attitude? Sometimes it is nothing more than a simple mistake. However, if you automatically start to throw defenses up, you will make people think that you have something to hide. I would simply lock the device and hand it over then retrieve it on the way home. No biggie.
cgc
Oct 19, 06:57 PM
I like that I see only one GUI in the various apps in the screenshots. One feature I'd love to see is more efficient/complete core control and improved Rosetta and Bootcamp performance.
LightSpeed1
Apr 11, 04:09 PM
I think, at least right now, carbon fibre would be prohibitively expensive.
That's what I was thinking.
That's what I was thinking.
samven582
Apr 26, 01:38 PM
You're looking at it wrong.
??
??
Laser47
Sep 12, 12:20 PM
I wonder why they reduced the price of the ipods by 50$, maybe to fit in the new video ipod?:D
colinp
Aug 7, 04:37 PM
Heh, got through thirty minutes before too many people killed my connection :cool:
I agree that SJ continues to look pretty sickly. Reminded me of Freddie Mercury. Not trying to raise any questions, I'm just saying....
I agree that SJ continues to look pretty sickly. Reminded me of Freddie Mercury. Not trying to raise any questions, I'm just saying....
wpotere
Apr 15, 06:32 AM
Probably should have checked to see if it was ok to bring a laptop to school in the first place. Most have pretty strict rules in this area.
EricNau
Mar 7, 12:46 AM
Not any more than I can hold that her own stupidity led to this as well.
Like I said previously, putting yourself in harm's way should not in any way absolve you from blame for what happens. When you use yourself as a human shield, you're going to get hurt - why should it be the other guy's fault?
I have to disagree. I doubt she was knowingly placing herself in harm's way. Jumping on the hood of a vehicle is dramatic, but I doubt she expected her husband to start driving, much less at speeds of 100 mph. As he started moving, she probably expected him to stop briefly to let her off; instead he just kept driving faster and faster.
Unless she could reasonably foresee her husband driving on the freeway at 100 mph with her still on the hood, then she did not "knowingly place herself in harm's way." And I don't think his actions were reasonably foreseeable by any means.
Besides, let's say for example that Spouse A is holding a gun, and Spouse B jumps in front of the gun to prevent "A" from shooting his/her favorite Ming Dynasty Vase (it's a priceless original, after all). Spouse A shoots anyway, killing Spouse B. ...Who's to blame? Spouse A for pulling the trigger, or Spouse B for protecting their vase? Even if standing in front of a gun is "stupid," I think it hardly fair to hold Spouse B accountable for Spouse A's actions of pulling the trigger.
It simply isn't acceptable to try to kill your wife, and that's exactly what this man did.
If a husband wanted to leave and his wife blocked the car, then you walk. You call a cab, take a bus, call a friend. You don't drive at speeds of 100 mph with her on the hood, unless stopping endangers your life as well (but nothing in the story indicates this to be the case). It's an inexcusable action, regardless of the circumstances.
Like I said previously, putting yourself in harm's way should not in any way absolve you from blame for what happens. When you use yourself as a human shield, you're going to get hurt - why should it be the other guy's fault?
I have to disagree. I doubt she was knowingly placing herself in harm's way. Jumping on the hood of a vehicle is dramatic, but I doubt she expected her husband to start driving, much less at speeds of 100 mph. As he started moving, she probably expected him to stop briefly to let her off; instead he just kept driving faster and faster.
Unless she could reasonably foresee her husband driving on the freeway at 100 mph with her still on the hood, then she did not "knowingly place herself in harm's way." And I don't think his actions were reasonably foreseeable by any means.
Besides, let's say for example that Spouse A is holding a gun, and Spouse B jumps in front of the gun to prevent "A" from shooting his/her favorite Ming Dynasty Vase (it's a priceless original, after all). Spouse A shoots anyway, killing Spouse B. ...Who's to blame? Spouse A for pulling the trigger, or Spouse B for protecting their vase? Even if standing in front of a gun is "stupid," I think it hardly fair to hold Spouse B accountable for Spouse A's actions of pulling the trigger.
It simply isn't acceptable to try to kill your wife, and that's exactly what this man did.
If a husband wanted to leave and his wife blocked the car, then you walk. You call a cab, take a bus, call a friend. You don't drive at speeds of 100 mph with her on the hood, unless stopping endangers your life as well (but nothing in the story indicates this to be the case). It's an inexcusable action, regardless of the circumstances.
